Peritoneal Dialysis: Marginal Dialysis? A Comparison of Opinions

Authors

  • Renzo Scanziani Divisione Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate, Presidio di Desio, Desio (MB)
  • Sara Auricchio Divisione Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate, Presidio di Desio, Desio (MB)
  • Marco Pozzi Divisione Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate, Presidio di Desio, Desio (MB)
  • Beatrice Dozio Divisione Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Desio e Vimercate, Presidio di Desio, Desio (MB)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2014.980

Keywords:

Integrated assistance, Training, Region

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers many advantages over hospital-based hemodialysis, including a better quality of life. Despite the scientific and technological developments, PD is generally underused, a fact that can be attributed not only to a lack of knowledge and education amongst renal clinicians and nurses, but also to an inappropriate PD outpatient management by dedicated staff. To expand the diffusion of PD we need more scientific research, training, and implementation of human resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-19

How to Cite

Scanziani, R., Auricchio, S., Pozzi, M., & Dozio, B. (2014). Peritoneal Dialysis: Marginal Dialysis? A Comparison of Opinions. Giornale Di Clinica Nefrologica E Dialisi, 26(Suppl. 5), S69-S70. https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2014.980

Issue

Vol. 26 No. Suppl. 5 (2014): Dialisi peritoneale, Dialisi marginale?

Section

Short Communications

License

Authors contributing to Giornale di Clinica Nefrologica e Dialisi (GCND) agree to publish their articles under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which allows third parties to re-use the work without permission as long as the work is properly referenced and the use is non-commercial.

Metrics

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC