Vol. 13 No. Suppl. 1 (2001)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/039493620101301S01
Published: 2001-06-30

Editorials

  • Foreword

    Marco Lombardi
    S1-S1
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1644

  • Conclusions

    Marco Lombardi
    S65-S66
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1669

Original articles

  • Marginal Dialysis

    Marco Lombardi
    S3-S5
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1645

  • Why doesn't peritoneal dialysis grow in Italy? The Reasons of the Stasis and the Development Perspectives

    Gianpaolo Amici
    S6-S7
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1646

  • Development of Peritoneal Dialysis in Italy: Experience of an Accredited Private Hospital

    Silvio Bertoli, Laura Buzzi, Daniele Ciurlino
    S8-S9
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1647

  • Peritoneal dialysis in Italy: Is it adequately used or is it possible to further increase it?

    Giuliano Brunori
    S10-S11
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1648

  • The reasons for which in Italy the percentage of patients in DP remains steadily low

    Umberto Buoncristiani
    S12-S13
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1649

  • Why Does Poca DP in Italy? An Answer From Sicily

    Flavia Caputo, Marco Lombardi
    S14-S15
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1650

  • Come on again!

    Luigi Catizone
    S16-S18
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1651

  • Peritoneal Dialysis: A Promise Not Maintained?

    Roberto Cocchi
    S19-S21
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1652

  • Investigation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Italy

    Giuliano Colasanti, Maria Teresa Porri
    S22-S23
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1653

  • Peritoneal Dialysis: Why Marginal Dialysis?

    Roberto Corciulo
    S24-S26
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1654

  • What Reasons and What Possible Solutions for Lack of Peritoneal Dialysis Development in Italy?

    Amedeo F. De Vecchi
    S27-S29
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1655

  • Why is peritoneal dialysis poorly used in Italy?

    Nicola Di Paolo
    S30-S31
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1656

  • Some socio-organizational reflections on the poor penetrance of peritoneal dialysis in Italy

    Mariano Feriani
    S32-S34
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1657

  • Prejudice to the spread of peritoneal dialysis in Italy

    Paolo Gabella
    S35-S36
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1658

  • DP: marginal dialysis?

    Michele Giannattasio, Roberto La Rosa
    S37-S38
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1659

  • Because peritoneal dialysis in Italy has low penetration

    Giuseppe La Greca
    S39-S42
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1660

  • Marginality of peritoneal dialysis: probable result of economic misunderstandings, technical problems and use criteria

    Giancarlo Ruggieri
    S45-S47
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1661

  • Because the spread of peritoneal dialysis is still unsatisfactory

    Carlo Rugiu, Antonio Lupo
    S48-S49
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1662

  • Low prevalence of DP use in Italy: is this the problem?

    Mario Salomone
    S50-S52
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1663

  • Peritoneal dialysis in Italy in 2000. The reasons for a penetration in the treatment of uremia stops for years at 10%

    Renzo Scanziani
    S53-S54
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1664

  • Peritoneal dialysis: Why marginal dialysis? Peritoneal dialysis: why marginal dialysis?

    Sergio Sisca
    S55-S58
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1665

  • Too little DP in Italy

    Giusto Viglino
    S59-S60
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1666

  • Strategies for increasing the percentage of uremic patients in peritoneal dialysis in Italy

    Giovambattista Virga, Stefania Mastrosimone
    S61-S62
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1667

  • Not a little peritoneal in Italy but a little peritoneal in the South

    Carmine Zoccali
    S63-S64
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1668