‘Therapeutic Alternatives’: Procurement Rules for Drugs with Same Indication but without Equivalence Certification Released According to the Balduzzi Law
Le “alternative terapeutiche”: tecniche di procurement dei farmaci aventi la medesima indicazione terapeutica ma sprovvisti di parere di equivalenza rilasciato secondo la Legge Balduzzi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2015.341Keywords:
Balduzzi law, Drug equivalence, Drug procurementAbstract
In Italy, a national law issued in 2012 has drastically modified the procurement rules for running local tenders in the field of drugs with ‘similar’ clinical indications. According to this law, tenders involving these drugs are subjected to a pre-authorization that the National Medicines Agency (AIFA) must release to certify that the different agents included in the same lot of the tender are equivalent with one another in terms of effectiveness and safety. Since this represents a profound change in comparison with the past, operational difficulties in managing tenders have rapidly emerged at local level immediately after the new law. Also AIFA must face a difficult challenge because the turnaround times for the response have become critical as well. This article summarizes the present situation about this controversial issue in Italy and highlights the advantages and drawbacks of choices adopted so far by different local institutions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-03-07
How to Cite
Messori, A., Fadda, V., & Trippoli, S. (2015). ‘Therapeutic Alternatives’: Procurement Rules for Drugs with Same Indication but without Equivalence Certification Released According to the Balduzzi Law: Le “alternative terapeutiche”: tecniche di procurement dei farmaci aventi la medesima indicazione terapeutica ma sprovvisti di parere di equivalenza rilasciato secondo la Legge Balduzzi. Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment, 2(3), 158–160. https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2015.341
Issue
Section
Point of View
License