Vol. 13 No. Suppl. 2 (2001)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03949362010130s201
Published: 2001-12-30

Editorials

  • Foreword

    Marco Lombardi
    S3-S3
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1670

  • Conclusions

    Marco Lombardi
    S60-S62
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1693

Original articles

  • Does it still make sense to do home hemodialysis in 2001?

    Marco Lombardi
    S5-S8
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1671

  • Home hemodialysis

    Sandro Alloatti
    S9-S11
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1672

  • Home dialysis. Current situation and future prospects

    Paolo Altieri, Giovanna Sau, Gianfranca Cabiddu
    S12-S13
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1673

  • Home hemodialysis: the experience of a small center

    Pietro Bajardi
    S14-S16
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1674

  • Home hemodialysis: causes of the crisis and bases for recovery

    Umberto Buoncristiani
    S17-S19
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1675

  • Home extracorporeal hemodialysis: experience of a Center and future prospects

    Salvatore David
    S20-S22
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1676

  • Hemodialysis treatment today

    Giuseppe D'Amico
    S23-S24
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1677

  • Home hemodialysis: effective goal in a given context, difficult to achieve in the current context

    Giuliano Giachino
    S25-S26
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1678

  • Home hemodialysis: a superior quality, poorly used dialysis technique

    Michele Giannattasio
    S27-S29
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1679

  • Home extracorporeal dialysis: a still desirable therapeutic option

    Marco Gonella
    S30-S31
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1680

  • Home hemodialysis today: unresolved weaknesses

    Francesco Locatelli
    S32-S33
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1681

  • It still makes sense to do EDD today

    Rosario Maiorca
    S34-S34
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1682

  • Old motivations and new proposals for home hemodialysis

    Moreno Malaguti, Marco Biagini
    S35-S37
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1683

  • Home hemodialysis: after ascent and fall there will be rebirth?

    Luigi Minetti
    S38-S39
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1684

  • Home dialysis

    Francesco Mastrangelo
    S40-S41
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1685

  • Who's back!!! Home dialysis, this time every day

    Francesco P. Schena, Giovanni Pertosa
    S42-S43
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1686

  • Does home hemodialysis still make sense in 2001? Problems and solutions to resume a home dialysis program

    Giorgina B. Piccoli
    S44-S48
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1687

  • The dialysis I would choose in 2001

    Angela Rosa Pinciaroli
    S49-S51
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1688

  • EDD could still play an important role

    Claudio Ponticelli
    S52-S52
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1689

  • Does it still make sense to do home hemodialysis in 2001?

    Francesco Quarello, Marco Pozzato
    S53-S55
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1690

  • Home hemodialysis: as for ribollita, it gives an obligation by necessity to a restricted choice for connoisseurs

    Giancarlo Ruggieri
    S56-S58
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1691

  • The CALs have replaced the EDD in Emilia Romagna

    Pietro Carlo Zucchelli
    S59-S59
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1692

Points of View

  • Open door: space reserved for any pertinent or impertinent comment

    Marco Lombardi, Giovambattista Virga
    S63-S68
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1694

  • Selection from the SociSin mailing list of the Supplement "Peritoneal dialysis: marginal dialysis"

       
    S69-S74
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/gcnd.2001.1695