Circulating progastrin-releasing peptide in the diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and in therapeutic monitoring

Authors

  • Vittoria Barchiesi Department “Campania Centro”, A.O.R.N. “Antonio Cardarelli”, Napoli - Italy
  • Vittorio Simeon Medical Statistics Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli - Italy
  • Claudia Sandomenico Thoracic Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, “Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli - Italy
  • Monica Cantile Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, “Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli - Italy
  • Dionigio Cerasuolo Laboratory Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, “Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli - Italy
  • Paolo Chiodini Medical Statistics Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli - Italy
  • Alessandro Morabito Thoracic Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, “Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli - Italy
  • Ernesta Cavalcanti Laboratory Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, “Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli - Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2021.2212

Keywords:

Lung cancer, proGRP, Serum biomarker

Abstract

Introduction: Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP), a precursor of GRP, has been recently reported as a putative circulating biomarker for differential diagnosis between non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. We evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of proGRP to differentiate patients with NSCLC and SCLC and the usefulness of combined measurement of proGRP and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) for diagnosing SCLC.

Methods: Serum proGRP, NSE, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 (CYFRA 21.1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC Ag) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were prospectively collected and measured in patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer. Serum proGRP was also measured in healthy subjects. The serum proGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21.1 and CEA concentrations were determined by an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and the serum SCC Ag concentration was determined by an automated immunofluorescence assay. Differences between proGRP and NSE in patients with SCLC and NSCLC were evaluated and compared using Mann-Whitney test.

Results: A total of 77 patients affected by SCLC (n = 17) and NSCLC (n = 60) were enrolled in the present study. Moreover, 50 cases of healthy subjects were analyzed for proGRP. SCLC patients showed a significantly higher proGRP (1,484 pg/mL; range 168-3,777) levels compared to NSCLC patients (45 pg/mL; range 31.7-60.6), p<0.0001. In healthy subjects the median proGRP level was 36.1 (28.8-43.5) pg/mL, significantly lower than SCLC patients. ProGRP showed a higher specificity when compared to NSE, with a difference in proportion of 47.5% (95% confidence interval 32.5% to 62.5%, p<0.001). Serial measurements of proGRP in SCLC patients showed a decrease in responsive chemotherapy patients.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 PMID:25220842
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332 PMID:26742998
  3. Currie GP, Kennedy AM, Denison AR. Tools used in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: what’s old and what’s new? QJM. 2009;102(7):443-448. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp038PMID:19372092
  4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Non-small cell lung cancer. V6. Online https://www.nccn.org (Accessed: October 2020).
  5. Byers LA, Rudin CM. Small cell lung cancer: where do we go from here? Cancer. 2015;121(5):664-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29098 PMID:25336398
  6. Dong Y, Zheng X, Yang Z, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron-specific enolase as biomarkers for diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12(5)(suppl):34-36. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.191626 PMID:27721249
  7. Molina R, Augé JM, Bosch X, et al. Usefulness of serum tumor markers, including progastrin-releasing peptide, in patients with lung cancer: correlation with histology. Tumour Biol. 2009;30(3):121-129. https://doi.org/10.1159/000224628 PMID:19506400
  8. NACB: Practice Guidelines and Recommendations for use of Tumor Markers in the Clinic Lung Cancer (Section 3P), 2006.
  9. Molina R, Holdenrieder S, Auge JM, Schalhorn A, Hatz R, Stieber P. Diagnostic relevance of circulating biomarkers in patients with lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2010;6(3-4):163-178. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2009-0127 PMID:20660962
  10. Yamaguchi K, Abe K, Kameya T, et al. Production and molecular size heterogeneity of immunoreactive gastrin-releasing peptide in fetal and adult lungs and primary lung tumors. Cancer Res. 1983;43(8):3932-3939. PMID:6861155
  11. Wang D, Yeger H, Cutz E. Expression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor gene in developing lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;14(5):409-416. https://doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb.14.5.8624245 PMID:8624245
  12. Erisman MD, Linnoila RI, Hernandez O, DiAugustine RP, Lazarus LH. Human lung small-cell carcinoma contains bombesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79(7):2379-2383. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.7.2379 PMID:6285381
  13. Moody TW, Pert CB, Gazdar AF, Carney DN, Minna JD. High levels of intracellular bombesin characterize human small-cell lung carcinoma. Science. 1981;214(4526):1246-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6272398 PMID:6272398
  14. Lv ShP, Wang Y, Huang L, Wang F, Zhou JG, Ma H. Meta-analysis of serum gastrin-releasing peptide precursor as a biomarker for diagnosis of small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(2):391-397. PMID:28345820
  15. Holdenrieder S, von Pawel J, Dankelmann E, et al. Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in monitoring first-line chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(23):7813-7821. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0678 PMID:19047109
  16. Wojcik E, Kulpa JK. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) as a biomarker in small-cell lung cancer diagnosis, monitoring and evaluation of treatment response. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017;8:231-240. https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S149516 PMID:29238236
  17. Kim HR, Oh IJ, Shin MG, et al. Plasma proGRP concentration is sensitive and specific for discriminating small cell lung cancer from nonmalignant conditions or non-small cell lung cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26(5):625-630. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.5.625PMID:21532852
  18. Oh HJ, Park HY, Kim KH, et al. Progastrin-releasing peptide as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker of small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(9):2530-2537. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.08.72 PMID:27747005
  19. Molina R, Auge JM, Filella X, et al. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) in patients with benign and malignant diseases: comparison with CEA, SCC, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in patients with lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(3A):1773-1778. PMID:16033098
  20. Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D. Comparing the accuracy of two diagnostic tests. 2nd ed. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. Wiley 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470906514.ch5
  21. Yang HJ, Gu Y, Chen C, Xu C, Bao YX. Diagnostic value of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide for small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(6):1039-1046. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.161 PMID:21649553
  22. Wang L, Wang D, Zheng G, et al. Clinical evaluation and therapeutic monitoring value of serum tumor markers in lung cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2016;31(1):e80-e87. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.5000177 PMID:26560853
  23. Wu XY, Hu YB, Li HJ, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of progastrin-releasing peptide on small-cell lung cancer: a single-center experience in China. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(9):4328-4334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13722 PMID:29989303
  24. Cavalieri S, Morelli D, Martinetti A, et al. Clinical implications for pro-GRP in small cell lung cancer. A single center experience. Int J Biol Markers. 2018;33(1):55-61. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijbm.5000305 PMID:28967066