Dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein predicts survival, renal recovery and the need for kidney replacement therapy in acute kidney injury

Authors

  • Nikolaos Pagonas Department of Internal Medicine – Cardiology, Neuruppin University Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Neuruppin - Germany and Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW), joint faculty of the University of Potsdam, the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus - Germany
  • Oliver Pfeifer Department of Internal Medicine I – Cardiology, Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brandenburg University Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Brandenburg an der Havel - Germany https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3246-4170
  • Stefan Erfurt Department of Internal Medicine I – Cardiology, Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brandenburg University Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Brandenburg an der Havel - Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8892-1805
  • Meike Hoffmeister Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW), joint faculty of the University of Potsdam, the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus - Germany and Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute of Biochemistry, Brandenburg an der Havel - Germany
  • Oliver Ritter Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW), joint faculty of the University of Potsdam, the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus - Germany and Department of Internal Medicine I – Cardiology, Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brandenburg University Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Brandenburg an der Havel - Germany
  • Theodoros Kelesidis Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas - USA
  • Daniel Patschan Faculty of Health Sciences (FGW), joint faculty of the University of Potsdam, the Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and the Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus - Germany and Department of Internal Medicine I – Cardiology, Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Brandenburg University Hospital, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Brandenburg an der Havel - Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-5254

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2026.3584

Keywords:

Acute Kidney Injury, Dysfunctional HDL, HDLox, Kidney replacement therapy, Oxidized HDL, Renal recovery

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing evidence that oxidative stress contributes not only to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis but also to acute kidney injury (AKI). This study investigated the prognostic value of nHDLox (normalized high-density lipoprotein with reduced antioxidant function) in hospitalized patients with AKI.
Methods: nHDLox was measured within 48 hours of AKI diagnosis. We assessed its performance in predicting the following primary endpoints: in-hospital all-cause mortality, need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and restoration of kidney function before discharge. Secondary endpoints included clinical markers of severe disease course: intensive care treatment, ventilatory support, and vasopressor requirement.
Results: Among 132 participants, 16.7% died in the hospital, 36.4% required KRT, and 31.1% had no restoration of kidney function. For all primary endpoints, nHDLox levels were significantly higher in non-survivors (2.00 vs. 1.26; +58.7%; p = 0.009), in patients requiring KRT (1.66 vs. 1.23; +34.9%; p = 0.002), and in those without renal recovery (1.71 vs. 1.23; +39.0%; p = 0.001). nHDLox was independently associated with death, KRT, and lack of renal recovery, with odds ratios for a twofold increase (95% CI) of 1.88 (1.19-2.98), 1.78 (1.17-2.69), and 2.09 (1.34-3.26), respectively. Predictive performance was moderate, with AUC-ROC values (95% CI) of 0.68 (0.54-0.81), 0.66 (0.56-0.76), and 0.67 (0.57-0.78). No differences were observed across secondary endpoints.
Conclusions: Impaired antioxidant HDL function is closely associated with clinically relevant AKI outcomes. nHDLox, therefore, represents a significant risk factor in both cardiovascular and kidney disease.

Introduction

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

AKI is a prevalent condition that is often linked to high mortality rates. It is estimated that around 3-18% of all hospitalized patients develop AKI (1), with incidences up to 57% in critically ill patients (2). AKI-related mortality averages 23% (3), reaching 50% in patients requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) and up to 60% in patients with sepsis-associated AKI in the intensive care unit (4). Worldwide, AKI-associated mortality exceeds that of diabetes, heart failure, and breast cancer combined (5). Despite its frequency and high mortality, the diagnosis and treatment of AKI often remain suboptimal. A British study found that over 50% of AKI patients were not treated according to guidelines, and 43% of AKI cases were either not diagnosed or diagnosed too late (6).

Oxidative Stress, Lipid Peroxidation, and AKI

AKI is characterized by inflammation and metabolic disturbances, culminating in systemic oxidative stress mediated by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (7). Under hypoxic conditions, ROS are typically generated within the mitochondria due to the dysfunction of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. After the heart, the kidney exhibits the second-highest resting metabolic rate and mitochondrial density in the body to support the numerous energy-demanding active transport processes, particularly within the proximal tubule (8). There is increasing evidence suggesting that products of lipid peroxidation play a significant role in the pathophysiology of AKI. For instance, studies have shown that increased plasma concentrations of the lipid peroxidation products F2-isoprostane and isofuran are linked to the onset of acute renal failure in septic patients (9). Additionally, acute oxidative stress induced by cell-free hemoglobin in severe malaria patients was associated with elevated levels of lipid peroxidation markers and increased incidence of AKI, requirement for KRT and mortality (10). Recent evidence suggests that ferroptosis, an iron-dependent and lipid peroxidation-driven process resulting in membrane destruction and necrotic cell death, is linked to the pathophysiology of AKI due to the kidney’s vulnerability to redox imbalances (11).

Oxidation of High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Cardiovascular Morbidity

In recent years, new evidence suggests that HDL function appears to predict atherosclerotic risk better than HDL quantity (12-14). Oxidative modification of HDL occurs through reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxide radicals, which alter the function of apolipoproteins, antioxidant enzymes (e.g. paraoxonase 1), phospholipids, and cholesteryl esters contained in the HDL particle, converting the atheroprotective, anti-inflammatory HDL into dysfunctional, pro-atherogenic, pro-inflammatory HDL (15,16). Oxidatively modified HDL is taken up by macrophages via endocytosis after binding at the scavanger receptor BI (SR-BI). This leads to the increased formation of macrophage foam cells – an important pathophysiological correlate and trigger of atherosclerosis (17-19). Furthermore, HDL from human atherosclerotic intima of the aorta showed high levels of the oxidative hypochlorous acid (20).

It has been demonstrated that the extent of oxidative modification is associated with a reduced cholesterol efflux capacity (21-24). Consequently, cell-free assay methods have been developed for detecting and quantifying oxidatively modified HDL (HDLox) in a simpler way, with results that are highly associated with the clinical implications of the cell-based assays (25-27). Thus, HDLox may be considered an important indicator of vascular diseases caused by oxidative stress (28). Growing evidence links elevated HDLox to multiple cardiovascular conditions, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (29), acute and chronic coronary syndromes (30,31), atrial fibrillation (32), severe aortic valve stenosis (33), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (34). In addition, HDLox has been associated with the degree of social deprivation in patients with coronary artery disease (35).

HDL Function and AKI

Normal HDL showed protective effects in several animal models of AKI (36,37). The importance of HDL in human AKI has been scarcely investigated so far. Existing studies have primarily focused on analyzing the quantity of HDL, rather than its function. So far, only one study has examined HDL function in AKI. Prado et al. demonstrated an association between oxidized HDL and markers of AKI (creatinine, KIM-1, NGAL, ß2-Microglobulin) as well as short-term mortality in a small cohort of 36 intensive care unit patients, by measuring oxidation of HDL based on an ELISA assay (38).

In the present study, we investigated the role of oxidized, dysfunctional HDL as a potential biomarker in AKI, specifically regarding its value for predicting mortality, the need for KRT, and clinical parameters indicative of a severe disease course. To our knowledge, we are the first to examine dysfunctional HDL using a cell-free, fluorometric method in a larger patient cohort with AKI, encompassing a substantial number of patients requiring KRT.

Methods

Study Design and Setting

This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted at the University Hospital Brandenburg (Germany) from May 2020 to May 2021. The cohort, study design, and patient characteristics were similar to those described in our group’s two recently published studies: “Soluble IL-33 receptor predicts survival in AKI” (39) and “Serum Nostrin - A risk factor of death, kidney replacement therapy and acute kidney disease in AKI” (40). The study has obtained approval from the local ethics committee (Brandenburg, 2019, No: E-01-20190820) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients or their legal representatives have given informed consent.

Participants

The study was conducted at a single university hospital, encompassing a comprehensive range of departments including: Cardiology, Pulmonology, Angiology, Nephrology, Rheumatology, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Infectiology, Hematology/Oncology, Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, General Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics, Neurosurgery, Vascular Surgery, Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Anesthesiology, Urology, and Neurology. Patients from all departments were included. Admissions occurred through various pathways, such as self-referral for physical complaints—primarily via the emergency department—specialist referral, emergency medical services, and direct medical accompaniment. Additionally, patients were occasionally transferred from nearby clinics, a procedure applicable to all specialties. The following inclusion criteria were defined: age 18 years or older, in-hospital diagnosis of AKI of various origins according to criteria I and II of the 2012 published KDIGO criteria. All patients developed AKI either upon admission or during their course of treatment. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, pregnancy, palliative state of illness, pre-existing chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, and suspected or confirmed active SARS-CoV-2 infection.

AKI—Definition and Diagnosis

AKI was diagnosed and classified (into three stages) according to the KDIGO criteria (41). Due to the absence of reliable data on urine output, the diagnosis of AKI was based solely on the measurement and kinetics of serum creatinine obtained from routine blood samples. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. An intrahospital electronic AKI alarm system was used to identify patients with AKI, automatically flagging elevated serum creatinine levels that met the KDIGO criteria for stages 1 and 2 and notifying the attending nephrologist. For cases of nosocomial AKI, the baseline creatinine measurement was typically taken at admission, with subsequent increases evaluated according to the KDIGO guidelines. When a patient was suspected of having developed AKI before admission, two criteria were applied: 1) recent pre-admission creatinine values—no more than three months old—from previous hospitalizations were used when available; or 2) if such values weren’t accessible, the lowest creatinine level recorded during the current hospital stay was selected as the reference point. This value was often observed at discharge, suggesting renal recovery. All data were pseudonymized.

Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT)

KRT was administered to non-critically ill patients in the form of hemodialysis or hemofiltration, while critically ill patients received continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD(F)) or slow extended daily dialysis (SLEDD). Intermittent dialysis and SLEDD were performed using the GENIUS® system (Fresenius Medical Care®), while CVVHD(F) was performed using the Multifiltrate® system (Fresenius Medical Care®). Anticoagulation was achieved either by administering non-fractionated heparin systemically or by applying citrate solution regionally. Blood flow and ultrafiltration rates were adjusted according to each patient’s specific requirements. The decision to initiate KRT and the choice of dialysis modality were at the discretion of the attending nephrologist.

Renal Recovery

Renal recovery was assessed at the time of discharge and defined according to Kellum, Fiorentino and Legrand (42-45) as being alive at hospital discharge with a maximum 50% increase in serum creatinine concentration compared to the value at admission (maximum 150% of the baseline value). Additionally, it required the absence of the need for KRT.

Blood Sampling and Assessment of Lipid Peroxide Content of HDL (nHDLox)

Blood samples were collected within 48 hours after diagnosing AKI. The blood collection was done in a supine position from a peripheral vein using two 3.5 mL serum tubes (BD Vacutainer® SST II Advance) or from a central venous catheter (CVC). The extent of HDL-associated lipid peroxidation, serving as a marker for dysfunctional HDL, was detected from blood serum using a cell-free, fluorometric assay based on the oxidation of the fluorochrome “Amplex Red”, as described elsewhere (27). This assay measures HDL lipid peroxidation as fluorescence units (FU) per mg/dL HDL and then normalizes the value to a pooled HDL control (apoB-depleted serum pooled from 10 healthy volunteers, who were not study participants). This yields a dimensionless ratio termed normalized HDLox (nHDLox):

The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.7% and 3.7%, respectively. All laboratory measurements were performed in Brandenburg, Germany.

Endpoints

The role of nHDLox was investigated regarding its prediction of three primary endpoints: in-hospital mortality, need for KRT, and recovery of kidney function. Additionally, a composite outcome was defined, comprising in-hospital mortality (all-cause) or the need for KRT. Secondary endpoints included markers of severe disease progression: admission to the intensive care unit, invasive or non-invasive ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, and administration of vasopressors. Furthermore, we examined the association of nHDLox with AKI severity (by AKI stage) and major comorbidities.

Statistics

As most variables were not normally distributed, all data were represented as median and interquartile range. Non-parametric tests were applied for the analysis of central tendencies. The Mann–Whitney U test was performed for comparison between two groups, and the Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison among three or more groups. The effect size (r) was reported according to Cohen (46). All tests for statistical significance were two-tailed, with a p-value less than 0.05 considered significant. For multiple comparisons, the significance level was adjusted according to Bonferroni and Dunn (47,48). Correlation analyses were performed using Spearmans’s method. To determine test accuracies, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the optimal cut-off value was calculated with Youden’s index (49). Odds ratios for the prediction of the primary endpoints were determined by univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Because the data of nHDLox were not normally distributed and skewed, a logistic transformation to the base of 2 was performed (log(2)(nHDLox)). The resulting log odds ratios (OR) must be interpreted such that a 2-fold increase in the concentration of nHDLox increases the probability of the endpoint by a certain percentage (percent increase = ([OR-1] * 100). Additionally, the coefficient of determination R2 (Pseudo-R-squared according to Nagelkerke) was provided (50). All regression coefficients of the variable log(2)nHDLox were highly significant (p < 0.005). Statistical analysis and graphics were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2022. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 29.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) and GraphPad Prism (version 10 for Mac OSX, GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).

Results

Baseline Characteristics and Outcome

A total of 132 patients were enrolled in the study, with 40.9% of them being female. The median age was 80 [67-84] years, and the median duration of hospitalization was 14 [9-20] days. The majority of patients were categorized as AKI stage III (61.4%). At admission, the median serum creatinine level was 173.0 [117.5-312.0] µmol/L, and the eGFR was 30 [13-47] mL/min/1.73 m². The most frequent etiologies of AKI were sepsis (33.3%), hypovolemia (22.7%) and cardiorenal syndrome (21.2%). Detailed patient characteristics can be found in Table 1.

Baseline characteristics by AKI stage are summarized in Table 2. Apart from age, no significant differences were observed across stages. The in-hospital mortality rate was 16.7% (n = 22). Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) was required for 36.4% (n = 48) of patients. Recovery of renal function was observed in 68.9% (n = 91) of cases (Table 3). Among the patients requiring dialysis, 27.1% (n = 13) remained dependent on KRT at the time of discharge. Among the 22 patients who died, 50% received both KRT and ICU treatment, while 40.9% underwent either non-invasive or invasive ventilation, and 40.9% received vasopressors. In comparison, in the entire group, only 33.3% (n = 44) required ICU admission, and 17.4% (n = 23) needed ventilatory support. Vasopressor administration was performed in 16.7% (n = 22) of all AKI patients, compared to 52.3% (n = 23) of ICU patients.

The most prevalent comorbidities included arterial hypertension (87.1%), chronic kidney disease (73.5%), and chronic heart failure (53.0%).

nHDLox

The median nHDLox at the time of AKI diagnosis was 1.28 [0.83-1.76] (Table 1). There was no significant difference in nHDLox by gender (female vs. male: 1.20 [0.74 - 1.75] vs. 1.32 [0.97-1.78]; p = 0.217) and no correlation with age (r = −0.114; p = 0.192).

AKI Stages and Etiology

Serum levels of nHDLox significantly varied across different AKI stages (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1), showing a trend of elevated nHDLox levels with increasing AKI severity (post hoc pairwise comparisons: AKI stage I vs. II (p = 0.039); I vs. III (p < 0.001); II vs. III (p = 1.00)). Additionally, significant correlations were observed between nHDLox and the maximum serum creatinine (Fig. 2).

Regarding the etiology of AKI, there were no significant differences in nHDLox levels among the various groups (p = 0.105). Among the deceased patients, sepsis-associated AKI (33.3%) was the most common, while hypovolemia (25.0%) was most prevalent among the survivors.

Variable Value
Age – years 80 [67 – 84]
Gender – n (%)  
 Female 54 (40.9)
 Male 78 (59.1)
AKI stage – n (%)  
 I 28 (21.4)
 II 23 (17.4)
 III 81 (61.4)
AKI etiology – n (%)  
 Sepsis 44 (33.3)
 Hypovolemia 30 (22.7)
 Cardiorenal 28 (21.2)
 Contrast-induced 17 (12.9)
 Hepatorenal 5 (3.8)
 Postrenal obstruction 1 (0.8)
 Drug-induced 1 (0.8)
 Other 6 (4.5)
Comorbidities – n (%)  
 Arterial hypertension 115 (87.1)
 Chronic kidney disease 97 (73.5)
 Chronic heart failure 70 (53.0)
 Diabetes 65 (49.2)
 Obesity 63 (47.7)
 Atrial fibrillation or flutter 63 (47.7)
 Coronary heart disease 53 (40.2)
 Cancer 37 (28.0)
 Chronic pulmonary disease 26 (19.7)
 Peripheral artery disease 19 (14.4)
 Liver cirrhosis 13 (9.9)
Baseline laboratory values  
 nHDLox(dimensionless) 1.28 [0.83-1.76]
 HDL-C – (mg/dL) 37 [27-52]
 LDL-C – (mg/dL) 64 [41-88]
 Cholesterol – (mg/dL) 166 [124-209]
 Triglycerides – (mg/dL) 161 [122-222]
 Creatinine – (µmol/L) 173 [118-312]
 eGFRCreatinine(mL/min/1,73 m²) 30 [13-47]
 C-reactive protein – (mg/L) 23 [7-57]
Table 1 -. Patient baseline characteristics (n = 132)
Variable AKI stage I AKI stage II AKI stage III p-value
Age (years ± SD) 80.7 ±1.8 78.4 ± 1.4 71.4 ± 1.6 0.002
Gender (females in %) 48.3 43.5 35.7 0.45
In-hospital treatment (days ± SD) 13 ± 1.2 14.4 ± 1.6 18.2 ± 1.3 0.18
Pre-existing CKD (%) 79.3 68.2 74.7 0.66
Arterial hypertension (%) 89.7 91.3 88.9 0.95
Coronary artery disease (%) 31 52.2 41.5 0.3
Heart failure (%) 55.2 56.5 54.4 0.98
Atrial fibrillation (%) 58.6 34.8 47.6 0.23
Stroke (%) 3.4 8.7 4.9 0.68
Peripheral artery disease (%) 10.3 17.4 14.6 0.75
Obesity (%) 44.8 42.9 50.6 0.75
Diabetes mellitus (%) 41.4 45.5 53.6 0.48
Liver cirrhosis (%) 6.9 17.4 8.4 0.37
History of neoplasia (%) 34.5 17.4 27.4 0.38
Table 2 -. Baseline characteristics of patients, by AKI stage
Variable Value
In-hospital death – n (%) 22 (16.7)
Kidney replacement therapy – n (%)  
 Initiated 48 (36.4)
 At discharge 13 (9.9)
Renal constitution at discharge – n (%)  
 Recovery 91 (68.9)
 No recovery 41 (31.1)
ICU treatment – n (%) 44 (33.3)
Vasopressors – n (%) 22 (16.7)
Ventilatory support – n (%) 23 (17.4)
In-hospital treatment – days 14 [9-20]
Table 3 -. Outcome measures (n = 132)

Primary Endpoints

The association between nHDLox and the primary endpoints (mortality, kidney replacement therapy, and recovery of kidney function) was assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and C-reactive protein level. The discriminative performance was evaluated with receiver-operating-characteristic curve analyses, and an nHDLox cut-off value was derived.

Mortality

AKI patients who died during hospitalization showed significantly higher nHDLox levels than survivors (2.00 [0.99-3.65] vs. 1.26 [0.79-1.67]; relative difference +58.7%; p = 0.009; r = 0.23) (Fig. 3). ROC analysis indicated that nHDLox predicted in-hospital death (AUC 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.81; p = 0.012). A cut-off of 2.19 was determined with a sensitivity of 50.0% and specificity of 91.8% (Fig. 3 and Table 4). AKI patients with nHDLox above the cut-off had an 11.2-fold increased risk of death during hospitalization (diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 11.22; 95% CI 3.8-33.0). In the multivariable logistic-regression model, nHDLox was independently associated with in-hospital mortality. A twofold increase in nHDLox corresponded to 1.88-fold higher odds of in-hospital death (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.19-2.98; Chi2 (4) = 10.71; p = 0.030) (Table 5).

FIGURE 1 -. Relation of nHDLox to acute kidney injury (AKI) stages (according to KDIGO 2012). Across AKI stages, nHDLox differed significantly, showing a trend toward higher levels with increasing AKI severity. nHDLox: normalized lipid peroxide content of high-density lipoprotein; * p = 0.04; ***p < 0.001; ns: not significant.

FIGURE 2 -. During hospitalization, nHDLox levels were significantly correlated with peak serum creatinine. nHDLox: normalized lipid peroxide content of high-density lipoprotein; r = correlation coefficient; *** p < 0.001.

Kidney Replacement Therapy

Patients with AKI who received KRT had significantly higher nHDLox levels at the time of AKI diagnosis than patients who did not require KRT (1.66 [1.05-2.22] vs. 1.23 [0.78-1.53]; relative difference +34.9%; p = 0.002; r = 0.27) (Fig. 3). ROC analysis determined a threshold of 1.64 for nHDLox to predict the necessity for KRT (AUC 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.76; p = 0.002) with a sensitivity of 54.2% and specificity of 79.8%. AKI patients with nHDLox above the cut-off had a 4.7-fold increased risk for needing KRT (DOR 4.66; 95% CI 2.14-10.14) (Fig. 3 and Table 4). In the multivariable logistic-regression model, nHDLox was an independent predictor of the need for KRT. A twofold increase in nHDLox was associated with 1.78-fold higher odds of receiving KRT (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.17-2.69; Chi2 (4) = 11.45; p = 0.022) (Table 5).

Recovery of Kidney Function

Compared with patients who achieved renal recovery, nHDLox was significantly higher in those who did not (1.71 [0.99-3.13] vs. 1.23 [0.79-1.60]; relative difference, +39.0%; p = 0.001; r = 0.28) (Fig. 3). ROC analysis revealed a cut-off for nHDLox of 1.76 as a predictor of no renal recovery until discharge (AUC 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78; p = 0.001), with a sensitivity of 48.8% and specificity of 85.7%. AKI patients with nHDLox levels above the cut-off had a nearly 6-fold increased risk for poor renal recovery (DOR 5.71; 95% CI 2.47-13.35) (Fig. 3 and Table 4). In the adjusted logistic-regression model, nHDLox was an independent predictor of inadequate renal recovery. A twofold increase in nHDLox was associated with approximately doubled odds of this outcome (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.34-3.26); Chi2 (4) = 13.623; p = 0.009) (Table 5).

FIGURE 3 -. Primary endpoints. Boxplots indicate significantly higher nHDLox levels in patients who died (A), received KRT (B) and had no renal recovery (C) (**p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves show moderate predictive performance of nHDLox for primary endpoints, with corresponding values provided in Table 4. KRT: Kidney Replacement Therapy; Rec: Recovery; nHDLox: normalized lipid peroxide content of high-density lipoprotein.

  Primary Endpoint  
Parameter Death KRT No Renal Recovery Composite of Death or KRT
AUC-ROC 0.68 (0.54-0.81) 0.66 (0.56-0.76) 0.67 (0.57-0.78) 0.72 (0.63-0.81)
p 0.012 0.002 0.001 <0.001
nHDLox cut-off 2.19 1.64 1.76 1.73
DOR 11.22 (3.82-33.00) 4.66 (2.14-10.14) 5.71 (2.47-13.35) 9.11 (3.59-23.13)
Sensitivity – % 50.0 (29.1-70.9) 54.2 (40.1-68.3) 48.8 (33.5-64.1) 49.2 (36.4-61.9)
Specificity – % 91.8 (86.7-96.9) 79.8 (71.2-88.4) 85.7 (78.5-92.9) 90.4 (83.7-97.2)
PPV – % 55.0 (33.2-76.8) 60.5 (45.9-75.1) 60.6 (43.9-77.3) 80.6 (67.6-93.5)
NPV – % 90.2 (84.7-95.7) 75.3 (66.3-84.2) 78.8 (70.7-86.8) 68.8 (59.5-78.0)
Table 4 -. Diagnostic performance of nHDLox for the primary endpoints and composite outcome

Composite Outcome

Fifty-nine patients (44.7%) experienced the clinically relevant composite outcome, comprising in-hospital all-cause mortality or the need for KRT. Individuals who experienced the composite outcome had significantly higher nHDLox levels than those who did not (1.67 [1.09-2.63] vs. 1.10 [0.78-1.50]; relative difference, +51.8%; p < 0.001; r = 0.37). In ROC analysis, nHDLox achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.81; p < 0.001) for the composite outcome (Table 3).

Using an nHDLox cut-off of 1.73, the diagnostic odds ratio was 9.11 (95% CI 3.59-23.13), with 49.2% sensitivity and 90.4% specificity. In the adjusted logistic regression model, a twofold increase in nHDLox was associated with 2.78-fold higher odds of the composite outcome (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.64-4.71; Chi2 (4) = 26.28; p < 0.001) (Table 5).

Secondary Endpoints

Association of nHDLox with indicators of a severe clinical course

The level of nHDLox showed no significant difference with respect to the need for intensive care (ICU vs. no ICU: 1.24 [0.66 - 1.83] vs. 1.30 [0.84-1.76]; p = 0.836), the requirement for invasive or non-invasive ventilation (ventilation vs. no ventilation: 1.67 [0.86-2.48] vs. 1.26 [0.83-1.70]; p = 0.158) or the necessity of vasopressors (vasopressors vs. no vasopressors: 1.18 [0.37 - 1.98] vs. 1.30 [0.82-1.78]; p = 0.350) (Supplement, Fig. S1). In addition, there were no correlations between nHDLox and the duration of ICU treatment in days (p = 0.545), ventilation duration in hours (p = 0.173), or total hospital treatment duration in days (p = 0.303).

Significant positive correlations were found between nHDLox and CRP levels (CRP at baseline: r = 0.294; p < 0.001; maximum CRP: r = 0.247; p = 0.004) (Fig. 4). The adjusted logistic-regression analysis revealed non-significant regression coefficients for CRP in predicting all primary endpoints (in-hospital death: p = 0.278; KRT: p = 0.420; renal recovery: p = 0.797), indicating that CRP levels were not independently associated with the primary outcomes. These findings suggest that CRP did not act as a confounder in the analysis of nHDLox.

Correlation of nHDLox with other serum lipids

In the studied AKI cohort, nHDLox showed a significant negative correlation with serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol (both p < 0.001), but not with triglycerides (p = 0.731) (Fig. 4).

Comorbidities

Patients with arterial hypertension, obesity, chronic heart failure, and liver cirrhosis exhibited significantly lower levels of nHDLox compared to patients without these respective comorbidities. No significant differences in nHDLox were found for other comorbidities (Supplement, Table S2).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest one exploring the association of dysfunctional HDL with AKI in hospitalized patients. We observed that nHDLox was independently associated with key clinical outcomes in AKI (mortality, KRT, and renal recovery), indicating potential biomarker utility. In addition, serum nHDLox levels differed significantly across KDIGO AKI stages and increased with greater AKI severity. Moreover, nHDLox exhibited a significant positive correlation with serum creatinine. These findings align with previous studies that indirectly assessed the lipid peroxide content of HDL, utilizing other markers indicative of compromised antioxidative HDL function. Smith et al. demonstrated a correlation between elevated preoperative serum levels of specifically small, dense high-density lipoprotein particles (HDL-P; “good HDL”) and a reduced incidence of postoperative renal failure in cardiac surgery patients (51). The protective function of HDL-P was indirectly indicated by observing an increase in the activity of the HDL-associated antioxidative enzyme paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) and a decrease in systemic serum levels of the oxidized phospholipid isofuran. To our knowledge, there is currently only one other study that directly investigated the connection between human serum levels of oxidized HDL and AKI. Prado et al. demonstrated in a small cohort of 36 intensive care patients that elevated systemic HDLox levels were associated with an increased occurrence of acute kidney failure and 28-day mortality (38). Similar to our findings, where increasing nHDLox levels were associated with a decreasing renal function, Prado et al. observed a positive correlation between HDLox and serum creatinine values, as well as other indicators of kidney injury (KIM-1, NGAL, ß2M). However, in contrast to our study, the clinical stages of kidney injury (according to KDIGO) and the necessity and frequency of KRT were not reported. Additionally, Prado et al. excluded patients with congestive heart failure and HDLox measurement was conducted in a different way by using an ELISA method (anti-ApoA-I antibodies), rendering direct comparisons of results challenging.

  Unadjusted Adjusted
Primary Endpoint ORlog(2) 95% CI R2 ORlog(2) 95% CI R2
In-hospital death 1.95 (1.25-3.03) 0.110 1.88 (1.19-2.98) 0.131
Kidney replacement therapy 1.81 (1.21-2.69) 0.096 1.78 (1.17-2.69) 0.114
Persistent AKI 2.05 (1.34-3.12) 0.132 2.09 (1.34-3.26) 0.138
Death or KRT 2.65 (1.63-4.30) 0.199 2.78 (1.64-4.71) 0.242
Table 5 -. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and outcomes. Across all primary endpoints, nHDLox was a significant predictor in univariable logistic regression and remained an independent predictor in multivariable models; it also showed the highest discriminative performance for the composite outcome

FIGURE 4 -. Correlation analysis. Serum levels of C-reactive protein (at the time of admission) and nHDLox showed a significant positive correlation (A). There was a significant negative correlation between nHDLox and serum levels of LDL (B) and total cholesterol (D), but not with triglycerides (C). nHDLox: normalized lipid peroxide content of high-density lipoprotein (dimensionless value); CRP: C-reactive protein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein. ***p < 0.001.

The high frequencies of comorbidities and the high percentage of stage III AKI in our patient cohort reflect the reality that most patients admitted to our hospital originate from areas with high socioeconomic deprivation (35). We observed a positive correlation (r = 0.294; p < 0.001) between nHDLox and CRP as a marker of inflammation. However, in the regression analyses, we did not observe any association between CRP and the primary endpoints in our study. Kelesidis et al. (52) also identified a positive correlation between high-sensitive CRP and nHDLox (r = 0.27; p < 0.001) in 234 HIV-positive, treatment-naïve patients. Cacciagiu et al. found comparable results regarding the association between elevated CRP levels and diminished HDL function in the context of chronic kidney disease. In the subset of individuals with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and heightened high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), a concomitant reduction in paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) activity was identified, indicative of compromised HDL antioxidative function (53).

The pathophysiology of AKI is complex and not fully understood. In our study, we identified an association between nHDLox and AKI. The precise mechanisms linking oxidative stress, dysfunctional HDL, and acute kidney disease need to be further elucidated. Zhang et al. (54) and Gao et al. (55) demonstrated that exposure to oxidized HDL resulted in increased ROS levels and the stimulated production of pro-inflammatory factors in both cultured mesangial cells and tubular epithelial cells in rats. Emerging research indicates that the kidney itself plays a crucial role in the metabolism and maintenance of HDL homeostasis, with oxidatively modified HDL being increasingly absorbed by tubular epithelial cells via endo- and transcytosis, potentially leading to an accumulation of detrimental, lipid hydroperoxide-rich HDL within the renal interstitium (56). Additionally, there is evidence for lipotoxicity of podocytes due to altered metabolism of cholesterol and free fatty acids called lipo-apoptosis (57,58). Considering the kidney’s vulnerability to redox imbalances due to iron overload or deficiency in thiols during acute illness, recent evidence links an iron-dependent and lipid peroxidation-driven process resulting in membrane destruction and necrotic cell death, called ferroptosis (11), to AKI.

In terms of the potential value of nHDLox as a future biomarker for AKI, our study unquestionably identified a new predictor for three clinically relevant endpoints of AKI syndrome: in-hospital mortality, need for dialysis, and renal recovery. Despite the progress made in AKI research over the past 20 years, many biomarkers not yet found widespread application in clinical routines (59). A 2020 consensus statement by Ostermann et al. (60) discussed various AKI biomarkers in terms of their diagnostic and predictive value. Five endpoint categories were defined: risk assessment, AKI prediction, early diagnosis, severity of the syndrome, and renal recovery. However, the aspects of in-hospital death and the need for dialysis were not considered.

Regarding survival, in our investigation, nHDLox exhibited an AUC-ROC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54-0.81; p = 0.012) for predicting in-hospital death, a performance comparable to that observed for AKI biomarkers in prior studies. Endre et al. explored six urinary biomarkers for predicting death within seven days following admission (61). Among these, interleukin-18, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and Cystatin C (all normalized to urinary creatinine) demonstrated the highest AUC-ROC values: 0.68, 0.66, and 0.66, respectively. Hall et al. investigated urinary IL-18, NGAL and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) for predicting in-hospital mortality and reported comparable AUC-ROC values of 0.63, 0.71, and 0.64, respectively (62). Recently, Erfurt et al. described the soluble Interleukin-33 receptor (sST2) (but without providing AUC-ROC values) (39) and serum Nostrin (AUC-ROC 0.62) (40) as another novel marker for predicting survival in AKI.

Concerning the need for KRT, the timely detection of the need for dialysis is of utmost importance, as evidenced by the ongoing debate over the benefits of early versus late initiation of dialysis in AKI (63-66). Klein et al. provided a comprehensive meta-analysis of urinary biomarkers predicting the need for dialysis (67). Compared to previous studies, the diagnostic accuracy of nHDLox (AUC-ROC 0.66) was similar to KIM-1 (pooled AUC-ROC 0.65), interleukin-18 (pooled AUC-ROC 0.67), and N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG; pooled AUC-ROC 0.71). Endre et al. investigated urinary biomarkers for the prediction of KRT in 528 critically ill patients and provided AUC-ROC values for KIM-1 (AUC 0.62), alkaline phosphatase (AUC 0.63), cystatin c (AUC 0.71), and NGAL (AUC 0.79) (61). In a study conducted by our group, Erfurt et al. found serum Nostrin to predict KRT with an AUC-ROC of 0.64 (40). In our study, nHDLox emerged as an independent predictor for the necessity of KRT. Patients with nHDLox above the cut-off had 4.7-fold higher odds of receiving KRT, suggesting that oxidative stress is associated with hemodialysis requirement. Similar results were found by Plewes et al., who demonstrated that levels of lipid peroxidation products were associated with increased rates of KRT (F2-isoprostanes: OR 3.45; and plasma isofuranes: OR 3.48) (10).

The investigation of biomarkers for predicting renal recovery and persistent renal damage remains largely unexplored. In our study, nHDLox emerged as an independent predictor of inadequate renal recovery (defined as serum creatinine 150% above the baseline at the time of hospital discharge) with AUC-ROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.57-0.78), which was comparable to the predictive ability of serum Nostrin (AUC-ROC 0.64) (40). However, its diagnostic accuracy is comparatively modest when contrasted to biomarkers examined by Hoste et al. for anticipating persistent stage III AKI, among which urinary chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), plasma cystatin C, plasma proenkephalin, urinary NGAL, and urinary liver fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) exhibited higher AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 (68). Notably, C–C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy with an AUC-ROC of 0.83. In our investigation, 9.9% of patients still exhibited an ongoing indication for dialysis at discharge. Comparable frequencies were observed by Bagshaw et al., where 5.7% (sepsis-associated AKI) and 7.8% (non-sepsis-associated AKI) of the patients still required KRT at discharge (69).

Limitations

Our study provides evidence for a strong association of nHDLox with outcomes of AKI but not for a causal association. The patients in our study exhibited advanced age and may represent a population with elevated oxidative stress, thus rendering our data not directly applicable to a younger patient cohort. Much data, such as renal function prior to hospital admission and the use of statins in outpatient medication were unavailable.

As for statin therapy, among patients with acute or chronic coronary syndrome, Sasko et al. found no significant difference in serum nHDLox levels between those receiving statins (n = 578) and those not receiving statins (n = 145) (p = 0.29) (31). Similarly, among patients with atrial fibrillation, Pagonas et al. reported comparable serum nHDLox levels in statin-treated and untreated patients (32). Additionally, post-discharge follow-up data were lacking, so our analysis was confined to short-term survival until discharge. The classification of AKI stages according to KDIGO had to be modified due to missing urine output data. Another limitation concerns the distribution of AKI stages, which did not align definitively with findings from larger surveys. A database study published in April 2025 reported on over 80,000 patients, nearly 18,000 of whom had an AKI (70). In that cohort, most cases were classified as stage I, whereas in our study, the majority of patients presented with stage III. The relatively small size of our sample may contribute to potential selection bias. It should be noted that baseline kidney function data were not consistently available, which may have affected the accuracy of AKI stage classification. Moreover, the association between nHDLox and serum creatinine was assessed under acute (i.e., non–steady-state) conditions, which constitutes a conceptual limitation. Furthermore, we refrained from adjusting the logistic-regression models for the eGFR measured at the time of nHDLox assessment, because nHDLox was obtained after the onset of kidney failure and contemporaneous eGFR primarily reflects AKI severity (a post-baseline variable). Such an adjustment could lead to overadjustment and collider bias. In addition, creatinine-based eGFR is of limited validity in the non–steady-state setting of AKI. Adjustment for baseline eGFR was not feasible because pre-admission baseline values were not uniformly available, which we acknowledge as a limitation.

Conclusion

Our study has identified nHDLox as a potential new biomarker in patients with AKI, predicting not only short-term survival but also the necessity of KRT and renal recovery. Our findings suggest that dysfunctional HDL may represent a significant risk factor not only in cardiovascular pathology but also in the context of kidney disease. The role that nHDLox may play in comparison to the aforementioned AKI biomarkers awaits further investigation and research.

Other information

This article includes supplementary material

Corresponding author:

Daniel Patschan

email: d.patschan@gmail.com

Disclosures

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to data privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author (d.patschan@gmail.com) upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hoste EAJ, Kellum JA, Selby NM, et al. Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(10):607-625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0 PMID:30135570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0
  2. Hoste EAJ, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(8):1411-1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7 PMID:26162677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7
  3. Susantitaphong P, Cruz DN, Cerda J, et al.; Acute Kidney Injury Advisory Group of the American Society of Nephrology. World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(9):1482-1493. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00710113 PMID:23744003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00710113
  4. Pickkers P, Darmon M, Hoste E, et al. Acute kidney injury in the critically ill: an updated review on pathophysiology and management. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(8):835-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06454-7 PMID:34213593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06454-7
  5. Lewington AJP, Cerdá J, Mehta RL. Raising awareness of acute kidney injury: a global perspective of a silent killer. Kidney Int. 2013;84(3):457-467. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.153 PMID:23636171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.153
  6. Joslin J, Wilson H, Zubli D, et al. Recognition and management of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients can be partially improved with the use of a care bundle. Clin Med (Lond). 2015;15(5):431-436. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-5-431 PMID:26430180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-5-431
  7. Pavlakou P, Liakopoulos V, Eleftheriadis T, et al. Oxidative stress and acute kidney injury in critical illness: pathophysiologic mechanisms—biomarkers—interventions, and future perspectives. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017(1):6193694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6193694 PMID:29104728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6193694
  8. Bhargava P, Schnellmann RG. Mitochondrial energetics in the kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(10):629-646. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.107 PMID:28804120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.107
  9. Ware LB, Fessel JP, May AK, Roberts LJ II. Plasma biomarkers of oxidant stress and development of organ failure in severe sepsis. Shock. 2011;36(1):12-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e318217025a PMID:21372753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e318217025a
  10. Plewes K, Kingston HWF, Ghose A, et al. Cell-free hemoglobin mediated oxidative stress is associated with acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy in severe falciparum malaria: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2373-1 PMID:28449641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2373-1
  11. Bayır H, Dixon SJ, Tyurina YY, et al. Ferroptotic mechanisms and therapeutic targeting of iron metabolism and lipid peroxidation in the kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(5):315-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00689-x PMID:36922653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-023-00689-x
  12. Navab M, Reddy ST, Van Lenten BJ, et al. HDL and cardiovascular disease: atherogenic and atheroprotective mechanisms. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(4):222-232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.222 PMID:21304474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.222
  13. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(2):127-135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1001689 PMID:21226578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1001689
  14. Linton MF, Yancey PG, Tao H, Davies SS. HDL function and atherosclerosis: reactive dicarbonyls as promising targets of therapy. Circ Res. 2023;132(11):1521-1545. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321563 PMID:37228232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321563
  15. Trakaki A, Marsche G. Current Understanding of the immunomodulatory activities of high-density lipoproteins. Biomedicines. 2021;9(6):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9060587 PMID:34064071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9060587
  16. Undurti A, Huang Y, Lupica JA, et al. Modification of high density lipoprotein by myeloperoxidase generates a pro-inflammatory particle. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(45):30825-30835. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.047605 PMID:19726691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.047605
  17. Sini S, Deepa D, Harikrishnan S, et al. High-density lipoprotein from subjects with coronary artery disease promotes macrophage foam cell formation: role of scavenger receptor CD36 and ERK/MAPK signaling. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;427(1-2):23-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-016-2895-7 PMID:27995417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-016-2895-7
  18. Holzer M, Gauster M, Pfeifer T, et al. Protein carbamylation renders high-density lipoprotein dysfunctional. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(12):2337-2346. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3640 PMID:21235354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3640
  19. Marsche G, Hammer A, Oskolkova O, et al. Hypochlorite-modified high density lipoprotein, a high affinity ligand to scavenger receptor class B, type I, impairs high density lipoprotein-dependent selective lipid uptake and reverse cholesterol transport. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):32172-32179. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M200503200 PMID:12070141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M200503200
  20. Bergt C, Pennathur S, Fu X, et al. The myeloperoxidase product hypochlorous acid oxidizes HDL in the human artery wall and impairs ABCA1-dependent cholesterol transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(35):13032-13037. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405292101 PMID:15326314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405292101
  21. Navab M, Ananthramaiah GM, Reddy ST, et al. The oxidation hypothesis of atherogenesis: the role of oxidized phospholipids and HDL. J Lipid Res. 2004;45(6):993-1007. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R400001-JLR200 PMID:15060092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R400001-JLR200
  22. Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Reddy ST, et al. Mechanisms of disease: proatherogenic HDL--an evolving field. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2(9):504-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0245 PMID:16957764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0245
  23. Gao D, Ashraf MZ, Zhang L, et al. Cross-linking modifications of HDL apoproteins by oxidized phospholipids: structural characterization, in vivo detection, and functional implications. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(7):1973-1984. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.008445 PMID:31907281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.008445
  24. Marsche G, Stadler JT, Kargl J, et al. Understanding myeloperoxidase-induced damage to HDL structure and function in the vessel wall: implications for HDL-based therapies. Antioxidants. 2022;11(3):556. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030556 PMID:35326206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030556
  25. Kelesidis T, Currier JS, Huynh D, et al. A biochemical fluorometric method for assessing the oxidative properties of HDL. J Lipid Res. 2011;52(12):2341-2351. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D018937 PMID:21957198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D018937
  26. Kelesidis T, Roberts CK, Huynh D, et al. A high throughput biochemical fluorometric method for measuring lipid peroxidation in HDL. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111716. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111716 PMID:25368900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111716
  27. Sen Roy S, Nguyen HCX, Angelovich TA, et al. Cell-free biochemical fluorometric enzymatic assay for high-throughput measurement of lipid peroxidation in high density lipoprotein. J Vis Exp. 2017;56325(128):56325. https://doi.org/10.3791/56325 PMID:29053671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/56325-v
  28. Matsunaga T, Koyama I, Hokari S, et al. Detection of oxidized high-density lipoprotein. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002;781(1-2):331-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00556-1 PMID:12450667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00556-1
  29. Li BQ, Zhong YC, Wang X. Plasma oxidized high-density lipoprotein and glycated apolipoprotein A-I concentrations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with stress hyperglycaemia or high thrombus burden. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123(3):158-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2018.1494229 PMID:30259778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2018.1494229
  30. Sasko B, Pagonas N, Christ M, et al. Oxidized high-density lipoprotein associates with cardiometabolic dysfunction in coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. J Intern Med. 2025;298(5):464-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.70019 PMID:40927849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.70019
  31. Sasko B, Scharow L, Mueller R, et al. Reduced high-density lipoprotein antioxidant function in patients with coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. JCI Insight. 2025;10(6):e187889. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.187889 PMID:40125555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.187889
  32. Pagonas N, Mueller R, Weiland L et al. Oxidized high-density lipoprotein associates with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(4):362-369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.024
  33. Sun JT, Chen YY, Mao JY, et al. Oxidized HDL, as a novel biomarker for calcific aortic valve disease, promotes the calcification of aortic valve interstitial cells. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019;12(6):560-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09903-3 PMID:31367900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09903-3
  34. Sasko B, Kelesidis T, Kostin S, et al. Reduced antioxidant high-density lipoprotein function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2026;115(2):232-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02583-3 PMID:39812805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02583-3
  35. Jaehn P, Sasko B, Holmberg C, et al. Levels of high-density lipoprotein lipid peroxidation according to spatial socioeconomic deprivation and rurality among patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(15):e343-e346. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac068 PMID:35574936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac068
  36. Thiemermann C, Patel NS, Kvale EO, et al. High density lipoprotein (HDL) reduces renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(7):1833-1843. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000075552.97794.8C PMID:12819243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000075552.97794.8C
  37. McDonald MC, Dhadly P, Cockerill GW, et al. Reconstituted high-density lipoprotein attenuates organ injury and adhesion molecule expression in a rodent model of endotoxic shock. Shock. 2003;20(6):551-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000097249.97298.a3 PMID:14625480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000097249.97298.a3
  38. Prado Y, Pérez L, Eltit F, et al. Procoagulant phenotype induced by oxidized high-density lipoprotein associates with acute kidney injury and death. Thromb Res. 2023;223:7-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2023.01.014 PMID:36689805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2023.01.014
  39. Erfurt S, Hoffmeister M, Oess S, et al. Soluble IL-33 receptor predicts survival in acute kidney injury. J Circ Biomark. 2022;11:28-35. https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2022.2386 PMID:35707675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2022.2386
  40. Erfurt S, Lauxmann M, Asmus K, et al. Serum Nostrin-A risk factor of death, kidney replacement therapy and acute kidney disease in acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0299131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299131 PMID:38603667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299131
  41. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-c184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789 PMID:22890468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789
  42. Kellum JA. How can we define recovery after acute kidney injury? Considerations from epidemiology and clinical trial design. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;127(1-4):81-88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363681 PMID:25343827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000363681
  43. Chawla LS, Bellomo R, Bihorac A, et al.; Acute Disease Quality Initiative Workgroup 16. Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(4):241-257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.2 PMID:28239173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.2
  44. Fiorentino M, Tohme FA, Wang S, et al. Long-term survival in patients with septic acute kidney injury is strongly influenced by renal recovery. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198269 PMID:29870535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198269
  45. Legrand M, Hollinger A, Vieillard-Baron A, et al.; French and euRopean Outcome reGistry in ICUs (FROG-ICU) Investigators. One-Year Prognosis of Kidney Injury at Discharge From the ICU: A Multicenter Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(12):e953-e961. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004010 PMID:31567524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004010
  46. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioralsciences. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  47. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc. 1961;56(293):52-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090
  48. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310(6973):170. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 PMID:7833759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170
  49. Nahm FS. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75(1):25-36. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21209 PMID:35124947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21209
  50. Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78(3):691-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
  51. Smith LE, Smith DK, Yancey PG, et al. Perioperative high density lipoproteins, oxidative stress, and kidney injury after cardiac surgery. J Lipid Res. 2021;62:100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100024 PMID:33453220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100024
  52. Kelesidis T, Jackson N, McComsey GA, et al. Oxidized lipoproteins are associated with markers of inflammation and immune activation in HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2016;30(17):2625-2633. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001238 PMID:27603288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001238
  53. Cacciagiú LD, González AI, Gomez Rosso L, et al. HDL-associated enzymes and proteins in hemodialysis patients. Clin Biochem. 2012;45(3):243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.008 PMID:22206739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.008
  54. Zhang M, Gao X, Wu J, et al. Oxidized high-density lipoprotein enhances inflammatory activity in rat mesangial cells. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010;26(6):455-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.1102 PMID:20623482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.1102
  55. Gao X, Wu J, Qian Y, et al. Oxidized high-density lipoprotein impairs the function of human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells through CD36. Int J Mol Med. 2014;34(2):564-572. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1799 PMID:24919723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1799
  56. Kon V, Yang HC, Smith LE, et al. High-density lipoproteins in kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158201 PMID:34360965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158201
  57. Gai Z, Wang T, Visentin M, et al. Lipid accumulation and chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):722. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040722 PMID:30925738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040722
  58. Li LO, Klett EL, Coleman RA. Acyl-CoA synthesis, lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801(3):246-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.09.024 PMID:19818872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.09.024
  59. Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, et al. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z PMID:34267223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z
  60. Ostermann M, Zarbock A, Goldstein S, et al. Recommendations on acute kidney injury biomarkers from the Acute Disease Quality Initiative Consensus Conference: a consensus statement. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2019209. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19209 PMID:33021646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19209
  61. Endre ZH, Pickering JW, Walker RJ, et al. Improved performance of urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in the critically ill by stratification for injury duration and baseline renal function. Kidney Int. 2011;79(10):1119-1130. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.555 PMID:21307838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.555
  62. Hall IE, Coca SG, Perazella MA, et al. Risk of poor outcomes with novel and traditional biomarkers at clinical AKI diagnosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(12):2740-2749. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04960511 PMID:22034509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04960511
  63. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al.; AKIKI Study Group. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):122-133. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603017 PMID:27181456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603017
  64. Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(20):2190-2199. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5828 PMID:27209269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5828
  65. The STARRT-AKI Investigators, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, the United Kingdom Critical Care Research Group, the Canadian Nephrology Trials Network, and the Irish Critical Care Trials Group. Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(3):240-251. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000741 PMID:32668114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000741
  66. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L, et al. Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10281):1293-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00350-0 PMID:33812488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00350-0
  67. Klein SJ, Brandtner AK, Lehner GF, et al. Biomarkers for prediction of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):323-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5126-8 PMID:29541790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5126-8
  68. Hoste E, Bihorac A, Al-Khafaji A, et al.; RUBY Investigators. Identification and validation of biomarkers of persistent acute kidney injury: the RUBY study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):943-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05919-0 PMID:32025755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05919-0
  69. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, et al.; Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(3):431-439. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03681106 PMID:17699448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03681106
  70. Esposito P, Cappadona F, Prenna S, et al. Acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with real-life analysis of incidence and clinical impact in Italian hospitals (the SIN-AKI study). Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):14261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96236-8 PMID:40274969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96236-8

Most read articles by the same author(s)