Analyses of 123 Peripheral Human Immune Cell Subsets: Defining Differences with Age and between Healthy Donors and Cancer Patients Not Detected in Analysis of Standard Immune Cell Types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2016.2071Keywords:
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells, Multicolour Flow Cytometry, Cancer, AgeAbstract
Recent advances in human immunology have led to the identification of novel immune cell subsets and the biological function of many of these subsets has now been identified. The recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of several immunotherapeutics for the treatment of a variety of cancer types and the results of ongoing immunotherapy clinical studies requires a more thorough interrogation of the immune system. We report here the use of flow cytometry-based analyses to identify 123 immune cell subsets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The use of these panels defines multiple differences in younger (< 40 years) vs. older (≥ 40 years) individuals and between aged-matched apparently healthy individuals and metastatic cancer patients, aspects not seen in the analysis of the following standard immune cell types: CD8, CD4, natural killer, natural killer-T, regulatory T, myeloid derived suppressor cells, conventional dendritic cells (DCs), plasmacytoid DCs and B cells. The use of these panels identifying 123 immune cell subsets may aid in the identification of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy, either prior to therapy or early in the immunotherapeutic regimen, for the treatment of cancer or other chronic or infectious diseases.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-03-10
How to Cite
Lepone, L. M., Donahue, R. N., Grenga, I., Metenou, S., Richards, J., Heery, C. R., Madan, R. A., Gulley, J. L., & Schlom, J. (2016). Analyses of 123 Peripheral Human Immune Cell Subsets: Defining Differences with Age and between Healthy Donors and Cancer Patients Not Detected in Analysis of Standard Immune Cell Types. Journal of Circulating Biomarkers, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2016.2071
Issue
Section
Original research article