Budget Impact analysis on models of purchase and management of aids for urinary incontinence compared

Authors

  • F.S. Mennini Institute for Leadership and Management in Health, Kingston University, London
  • P. Pisanti Direzione Generale Programmazione - Ministero della Salute, Roma – Italia
  • S. Terzoni European Association of Urology Nurses, Milano – Italia
  • E.P. Lanati MA Provider S.r.l., Milano – Italia
  • A. Marcellusi Institute for Leadership and Management in Health, Kingston University, London
  • A. Marcelli MA Provider S.r.l., Milano – Italia
  • A. Iorio MA Provider S.r.l., Milano – Italia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2018.447

Keywords:

Budget Impact, Urinary Incontinence

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a chronic condition affecting mainly elderly people, thus the budget to deal with is foreseen to grow significantly, especially in Italy, where there is a combination of private and public buying. In 2015, the Italian National Health System (NHS) spent 355 million Euros to provide pads to UI, while the out-of-pocket expenditure for the patients was 233 million Euros. The study aims to evaluate the impact of two different UI buying pathway by performing a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) vs current model. Methods: Three different scenarios were compared over a period of 3 years. Scenario 1 (“As is”), based on current model (2016-2017 expenditure), was compared to the: Scenario 2 (“Voucher”), implying the introduction of vouchers to entitle patients to acquire pads in the private channel without NHS tenders; Scenario 3 (“Tender management Optimization”) is based on an optimization of provided from NHS pads, according to patients UI severity. Results: Scenario 2 implies increase of NHS expenditure of 262 million Euros in the 2020, while Scenario 3 generates 21 million of savings vs scenario 1. Conclusions: The study indicates that the introduction of a new pathway in managing UI such as Scenario 3, could be sustainable for NHS and generate significant savings both for NHS and patient perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-09

How to Cite

Mennini, F., Pisanti, P., Terzoni, S., Lanati, E., Marcellusi, A., Marcelli, A., & Iorio, A. (2018). Budget Impact analysis on models of purchase and management of aids for urinary incontinence compared. Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2018.447

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Metrics