Introduction
The concept of indirect costs – or productivity losses to both patients and their informal caregivers arising from an illness – started to gain more importance two decades ago with the intention of strengthening cost estimates prior to evaluating, which historically was performed only with direct cost data.
Objective
The aim of this study is to explore the methodological differences in estimating productivity costs in studies of cancer diseases, as well as providing an updated and comprehensive overview of the worldwide relevance of productivity costs of cancer.
Methods
The study is conducted using a systematic literature review.
Results
The literature search resulted in 332 articles. After removing those not meeting eligibility criteria or duplicities, 27 articles were included in the qualitative analysis. It is observed that the weight of cost productivity is noticeable; in several cases, it may represent over 50% of the total. The most common method of estimation is the Human Capital method. However, certain heterogeneity is observed in the method of estimating, as well as in the resultant figures.
Conclusions
More efforts are needed to standardize calculations and allow for real comparisons between countries.
Gol-Montserrat, J., del Burgo, M. L. M., Quecedo, L., & del Llano, J. E. (2017). Analysis of Productivity Costs in Cancer: A Systematic Review. Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment, 4(1), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2017.384