Socio-economic impact of epilepsy in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2022.2427Keywords:
Co-morbidities, Economic burden, Economic impact, EpilepsyAbstract
The World Health Assembly recognizes the growing economic and societal burden of neurological disorders, a leading cause of disability and the second cause of mortality in the world.
In this context we analysed the socio-economic impact of epilepsy in Italy with a specific focus on hospitalizations and costs related to disability pensions (DPs) and ordinary disability allowances.
In the case of epilepsy, between 2009 and 2015 we observed an alarming increasing trend for DPs (+26%), indicating that substantial expenses must be supported throughout the patients’ lifetimes by both the social security system and the National Health Service (NHS) on top of the impact on caregivers.
We also analysed the hospital expenditure on epilepsy through the information available in the Hospital Discharge Cards between 2015 and 2018. Almost all admissions (76% ordinary hospitalizations, 24% day hospitals) were acute (95%), followed by rehabilitation (4%) and long-term care (1%).
The cost of acute and ordinary hospitalizations was by far the highest in 2018, the last year of analysis. This large expense due to hospitalizations could be reduced through the implementation of different organizational and management approaches. Our recommendation is that the policy maker should consider the best approach to ensure an early diagnosis for patients and provide early access to drugs and/or surgery. Finally, the adoption of new innovative treatments should improve effectiveness and, at the same time, reduce the expense of the NHS, of the social system as a whole, with a tangible improvement in patients’ quality of life.
Downloads
References
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 2019. Online https://www.issalute.it/index.php/la-salute-dalla-a-alla-z-menu/e/epilessia (Accessed May 2022)
Marras CE, Canevini MP, Colicchio G, et al; Commission on Epilepsy Surgery of the Italian League Against Epilepsy. Health Technology Assessment report on the presurgical evaluation and surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2013;54(suppl 7):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12309 PMID:24099055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12309
Marras CE, Colicchio G, De Palma L, et al. Health technology assessment report on vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6150. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176150 PMID:32847092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176150
Beghi E, Capovilla G, Franzoni E, et al. Midazolam vs diazepam in prolonged seizures in children: a pharmacoeconomic approach. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jan;137(1):24-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12814 PMID: 28875555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12814
Luoni C, Canevini MP, Capovilla G, et al. A prospective study of direct medical costs in a large cohort of consecutively enrolled patients with refractory epilepsy in Italy. Epilepsia. 2015;56(7):1162-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13030 PMID:26046371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13030
Lega Italiana contro l’epilessia. Libro Bianco dell’epilessia in Italia. UCB Pharma SpA, 2019. Online https://www.lice.it/pdf/Libro_bianco.pdf. (Accessed May 2022).
Feinstein AR. The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. J Chronic Dis. 1970;23(7):455-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(70)90054-8 PMID:26309916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(70)90054-8
Forsgren L. Prevalence of epilepsy in adults in northern Sweden. Epilepsia. 1992;33(3):450-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb01690.x PMID:1592018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb01690.x
Gaitatzis A, Sisodiya SM, Sander JW. The somatic comorbidity of epilepsy: a weighty but often unrecognized burden. Epilepsia. 2012;53(8):1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03528.x PMID:22691064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03528.x
Keezer MR, Sisodiya SM, Sander JW. Comorbidities of epilepsy: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(1):106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00225-2 PMID:26549780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00225-2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-05-30
Published 2022-06-28