Patient-reported outcomes in ovarian cancer

 

Authors

  • Ilaria Sabatucci Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
  • Francesco Perrone Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale IRCCS, Napoli, Italy.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19156/cbn.2017.0049

Keywords:

clinical benefit, clinical trial endpoints, ovarian cancer, CONSORT PRO extension, patient-reported outcomes

Abstract

Ovarian cancer treatments may negatively impact the physical and functional quality of life domains of patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) assess the health conditions of patients without interpretation by a clinician of the patient’s response. A broad spectrum of validated questionnaires investigating HR-QoL exist. However, none are considered as a gold standard of PRO measures. In clinical trials, PROs are a means of evaluating treatment benefit or risk in a way that complements the typical primary outcome of survival, and are necessary endpoints to support regulatory approval. In clinical practice, PROs are useful in monitoring the ability of patients to tolerate treatment and in identifying patients more at risk for subsequent health problems who would benefit from supportive care during and after treatment.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-17

How to Cite

1.
Sabatucci I, Perrone F. Patient-reported outcomes in ovarian cancer:  . CBN [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 17 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];5(2):51-4. Available from: https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/cancerbreakingnews/article/view/185

Issue

Section

Methodological corner