Feasibility and effectiveness of thoracic spine mobilization on sympathetic/ parasympathetic balance in a healthy population - a randomized controlled double-blinded pilot study

Authors

  • Slavko Rogan Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
  • Jan Taeymans Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
  • Peter Clarys Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
  • Ron Clijsen Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Landquart, Switzerland
  • Amir Tal-Akabi Department of Health Professions, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0067-2

Keywords:

Autonomic nervous system, Musculoskeletal manipulations, Heart rate variability

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapists often use thoracic spine mobilization (TSM) to reduce pain in patients with back disorders via a reduction of sympathetic activity. There is a “trade-off” in the activity of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity. A sympathetic/parasympathetic balance (SPB) is needed to guarantee body homeostasis. However, body homeostasis is seldom considered as an aim of the treatment from the perspective of most physiotherapists. Strong empirical evidence for the effects of TSM on the SPB is still lacking. Some studies showed that spinal manipulation may yield beneficial effects on SPB. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that TSM is feasible and could influence SPB reactions. The primary aim was to describe the participants’ adherence to the intervention and to the measurement protocol, to identify unexpected adverse events (UAE) after TSM, to evaluate the best method to measure SPB parameters (heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), skin perfusion and erythema) and to estimate the investigation procedure. The secondary aim was to assess the effects of TSM on SPB parameters in a small sample of healthy participants. Methods: This crossover pilot study investigated TSM using posterior-anterior mobilization (PAM) and anteriorposterior mobilization (APM) on segments T6 to T12 in twelve healthy participants during two consecutive days. To evaluate feasibility, the following outcomes were assessed: adherence, UAE, data collection and data analysis. To evaluate the effect of TSM on SPB, HRV, BP, HR, skin perfusion and erythema were measured. Results: The adherence was 100%. No UAE were reported. PAM showed larger effect sizes compared to APM in many secondary variables. Conclusions: Although 100% maximal adherence was reached and no UAE were observed, data recording in future studies should be done during a second time interval while the data transfer from device to the computer software should occur immediately after completion of each participant’s measurement. The results of this pilot study suggest that PAM can reduce HRV HF and HRV ratio LF/HF and increase HR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-09

How to Cite

Rogan, S., Taeymans, J., Clarys, P., Clijsen, R., & Tal-Akabi, A. (2019). Feasibility and effectiveness of thoracic spine mobilization on sympathetic/ parasympathetic balance in a healthy population - a randomized controlled double-blinded pilot study. Archives of Physiotherapy, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0067-2

Issue

Section

Research Article

Metrics