Rasch analysis of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire

Saravanan Esakki; Joy C. MacDermid; Joshua I. Vincent; Tara L. Packham; David Walton; Ruby Grewal

doi:10.1186/s40945-018-0046-z

Authors

Saravanan Esakki School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Joy C. MacDermid The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph’s Health Centre, London, ON, Canada
Joshua I. Vincent School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Tara L. Packham School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
David Walton School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Ruby Grewal Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-018-0046-z

Keywords:

PRWE, Rasch analysis, Patient-reported outcome measure, Distal radius fracture

Abstract

Background: The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) was developed as a wrist joint specific measure of pain and disability and evidence of sound validity has been accumulated through classical psychometric methods. Rasch analysis (RA) has been endorsed as a newer method for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the PRWE using Rasch modeling. Methods: We employed the Rasch model to assess overall fit, response scaling, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation index (PSI). A convenience sample of 382 patients with distal radius fracture was recruited from the hand and upper limb clinic at large academic healthcare organization, London, Ontario, Canada, 6-month post-injury scores of the PRWE was used. RA was conducted on the 3 subscales (pain, specific activities, and usual activities) of the PRWE separately. Results: The pain subscale adequately fit the Rasch model when item 4 “Pain - When it is at its worst” was deleted to eliminate non-uniform DIF by age group, and item 5 “How often do you have pain” was rescored by collapsing into 8 intervals to eliminate disordered thresholds. Uniform DIF for “Use my affected hand to push up from the chair” (by work status) and “Use bathroom tissue with my affected hand” (by injured hand) was addressed by splitting the items for analysis. After background rescoring of 2 items in pain subscale, 2 items in specific activities and 3 items in usual activities, all three subscales of the PRWE were well targeted and had high reliability (PSI = 0.86). These changes provided a unidimensional, interval-level scaled measure. Conclusion: Like a previous analysis of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation, this study found the PRWE could be fit to the Rasch model with rescoring of multiple items. However, the modifications required to achieve fit were not the same across studies, our fit statistics also suggested one of the pain items should be deleted. This study adds to the pool of evidence supporting the PRWE, but cannot confidently provide a Rasch-based scoring algorithm.