Teaching evidence‑based practice to physiotherapy students in Italy: a cross sectional study

Leonardo Piano; Alessandro Chiarotto; Marco Mascarello; Andrea Turolla; Simone Cecchetto; Silvia Gianola; Greta Castellini

doi:10.1186/s40945-023-00174-5

Authors

Leonardo Piano Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Alessandro Chiarotto Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marco Mascarello Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Andrea Turolla Unit of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Simone Cecchetto Direction of Health Professions, APSS, 38123 Trento, Italy
Silvia Gianola Silvia Gianola and Greta Castellini are co-last authors
Greta Castellini Silvia Gianola and Greta Castellini are co-last authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-023-00174-5

Keywords:

Evidence-based practice, Education, Physiotherapy

Abstract

Background Evidence-based practice (EBP) is being rapidly adopted by the Italian physiotherapy community, although a knowledge gap persists at clinical level with consequent lack of integration of EBP into ground roots practice. Teaching of EBP during the Bachelor of Science (BSc) undergraduate course in physiotherapy likely has a vital role to play in the spread of knowledge, providing a grounding in the fundamental concepts of EBP. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of EBP educational content in Italian BSc courses in physiotherapy. Methods This is a cross-sectional study during which characteristics of EBP teaching in BSc degree courses of physiotherapy in Italy were collected from institutional websites during the period May to September 2021 with an update in August 2022. We used the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for our manuscript. Results Forty-two physiotherapy BSc degree programs were retrieved, accounting for all the BSc delivered in the 2021–2022 academic year. Fourteen of these (33.3%) did not report EBP content. Northern universities provided EBP content in 16 out of 18 (88%) degree courses. Central Italian universities provided EBP content in 6 out of 9 (66.6%) degree courses. Southern universities delivered EBP content in 3 out of 9 (33.3%) degree courses. The universities of Sicily and Sardinia provided EBP content in 2 out of 5 (40%) degree courses. The degree courses taught in public universities were more likely to contain EBP material (25 out of 37, 67.4%), compared to those taught within the private system (3 out of 5, 60%). Conclusions The prevalence of EBP content within physiotherapy BSc degree programs in Italy can be considered suboptimal, with both regional differences and according to the system (public vs private). The results of this study could be used as a stimulus for increasing investment in the teaching of EBP in Italian physiotherapy degree courses, thereby improving educational standards.