Archives of Physiotherapy

The psychometric properties of the modified fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in Parkinson’s disease and older adults

Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Introduction: The Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ) has good psychometric properties. However, a recently modified version (mFFABQ) was theorized to be easier to understand because the updated Likert responses are more consistent with the item stem. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the mFFABQ in older adults and in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Methods: A total of 88 participants, 39 with PD (age = 72.2 ± 9.5; 29 males, 10 females) and 49 older adults (age = 72.8 ± 5.0; 13 males, 36 females) answered the mFFABQ twice, separated by one week, for test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through correlational analyses with fall history, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go, 30 Second Sit to Stand, Sensory Organization Test, Zung Anxiety Scale, Beck Depression Inventory; Consequences of Falling Questionnaire (CoFQ), and average daily activity levels using an activity monitor.

Results: The mFFABQ had good overall test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.822 (older adult ICC = 0.781, PD ICC = .806). The mFFABQ correlated with fall history (r=-0.430) and exhibited high correlation with the ABC (rho=-.804) and moderate correlations with CoFQ (rho=.582) and BBS (rho=-.595). The mFFABQ also correlated with time stepping (rho=-.298), and number of steps (rho=-.358).

Discussion: These results provide supportive evidence for the reliability and validity of the mFFABQ in older adults and people with PD, which supports its suitability as a clinical and research tool for the assessment of fear of falling avoidance behavior.

Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Introduction: Manual therapy is an often-utilized intervention for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The interpretation of results presented by these trials can be affected by how well the study designs align applicability to real-world clinical settings.

Aim: To examine the existing body of clinical trials investigating manual therapy for knee OA to determine where they fall on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum.

Methods: This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials that investigated manual therapy treatments for adults with knee OA were retrieved via searches of multiple databases to identify trials published prior to April 2023. The Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum (RITES) tool was used to objectively rate the efficacy-effectiveness nature of each trial design. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool (RoB-2) was used to assess the risk of bias across five domains.

Results: Of the 36 trials, a higher percentage of trials had a greater emphasis on efficacy within all four domains: participant characteristics (75.0%), trial setting (77.8%), flexibility of intervention (58.3%), and clinical relevance of experimental and comparison intervention (47.2%). In addition, 13.9% of the trials had low risk of bias, 41.7% had high risk of bias, and 44.4% had some concerns regarding bias.

Conclusions: While many trials support manual therapy as effective for the management of knee OA, a greater focus on study designs with an emphasis on effectiveness would improve the applicability and generalizability of future trials.