Reliability and validity of the Italian versions of the Children’s Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale

Authors

  • L Paglia Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Italian Stomatologic Institute, Milan
  • S Gallus Department of Environmental Health Sciences, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan
  • S De Giorgio Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Italian Stomatologic Institute, Milan
  • S Cianetti Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Perugia, Perugia
  • E Lupatelli Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Perugia, Perugia
  • G Lombardo Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Perugia, Perugia
  • A Montedori Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia
  • P Eusebi Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia
  • R Gatto Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, Division of Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Clinic, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila
  • S Caruso Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, Division of Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Clinic, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.08

Keywords:

Children, Children’s Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale, Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale, Dental fear, Validaty, Reliability, Italy

Abstract

AIM: Children's dental fear and anxiety (DFA) causes significant problems in clinical practice. The 15-item Children's Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS) and the 8-item Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) are the most widely used measures of dental fear in children. The aim of this study is to examine the reliability and validity of the Italian versions of the CFSS-DS and MCDAS, also in comparison with a simple visual analogue scale (VAS). METHODS: The CFSS-DS and MCDAS were translated into Italian by a consensus panel of experts and administered to 210 dental patients aged 4–11 years from three Italian Institutions. Internal reliability was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha correlation. A sub-sample of 60 children was selected for test-retest analysis. CFSS-DS and MCDAS, plus a VAS scale, rated both by children and parents, were validated using as gold standard the 4-item Frankl scale for behaviours assessed by dentists. CONCLUSION: The Italian versions of the CFSS-DS and MCDAS are valid and reliable tools for the assessment of dental fear in Italian children aged 4–11 years. A simple, one-item VAS, and dental fear and anxiety evaluation by parents may be valid and quick alternatives to multi-item indices to predict an uncooperative children behaviour.